FATAL
SENTIMENTAL LOVE RELIGION IN THE GREAT GATSBY

By
Simon Ntamwana
2015/01/M/IB/2326
AMERICAN STUDIES MASTER
PROGRAM, DEPARTMENT OF INTERCULTURAL STUDIES, FACULTY OF CULTURAL SCIENCES,
GADJAH MADA UNIVERSITY
YOGYAKARTA
SENTIMENTAL LOVE RELIGION AS CAUSE
OF DEATH IN THE GREAT GATSBY
Abstract
This paper aims at discussing the issue of obsessive love in
The Great Gatsby and the tragedy brought about by love through a
psychoanalyst literary approach. It anchors on the assumption that sentimental
love religion evolves into unconscious desires and motivations which sometimes
bring about death of the seducer or the seduced. In accordance with the
aforementioned hypothesis and aims, the research is based upon the qualitative
descriptive method by using psychoanalyst literary criticism. The research
source data consist of primary data source and secondary data source. The
primary data source is the novel The Great Gatsby and the secondary
sources are existing literature related to the topic. The data were collected
based upon the interactive model, consecutively through data collection, data
reduction, data analysis and discussion, and conclusion drawing. It was found
out that uncontrolled sexual drives of both male and female characters cause
their deaths. In their lecherous situation, their love sentiments are not equally
reciprocated by their partners who instead practice adultery with other people.
Thus these characters fatally succumb the anger of their love opponents.
Keywords:
Sentimental love religion, psychoanalysis, The Great Gatsby
Introduction
The issue
of sentimental love is at the center of the modern American literature in
general and American novel in particular. In this kind of literature, sometimes
heroes and /or heroines go further to adore their partners like gods. Whether
seduced or not, in many cases the storylines turn to the tragedy of the hero or
heroine. In some other cases, the protagonist ends up with success while some
other character or characters succumb the infatuation climax or the love
affairs of the hero or heroine. Fiedler (1960) refers to this belief in love
salvation as sentimental love religion. While in some novels authors portray a
hero who stands up right and overcomes the love trials, in some others they
point to the heroine who glaringly emerges thanks to her virtue or tactics.
This differentiation is, according to Fiedler (13), a revival of the archetype
of The Great Mother versus The Good Father in American literature.
Following
the sentimental love tradition, Fitzgerald depicts the horror of
sentimental love in The Great Gatsby. The hero Jay Gatsby is victim of
the sensuous and sensual allure of a temptress Daisy. Despite his love
manoeuvres, Gatsby fails to win the love of Daisy and thus succumbs the love
drives of his antagonists who orchestrate his death. Gatsby’s tragic end is
shared with other characters, namely Wilson and his wife Myrtle who equally are
victims of their sexual drives. Many writers and critics have written on The
Great Gatsby focussing either on the American dream (Reed 2009, Lucic 2014,
and Islam 2014) or woman revolution (Froehlich 2010). But to the best of my
knowledge, no two-variable work has been done to tackle the issue of love and
death in this novel. In the Norton Anthology of the American Literature, The
Great Gatsby is described as a novel written by F. Scott Fitzgerald. It was
firstly published in 1925. The story is set in New York city and Long Island.
During the production of this novel, the American society was characterized
by economic prosperity and the evolution of jazz music, flapper culture,
bootlegging and moral decay. The Great Gatsby is related to the life
background of the author, Fitzgerald who after his education in Princeton, went
to the army. While Lieutenant, he fell in love with Zelda Sayre who demanded
him to make wealth in order to match her love. Against the backdrop of the
psychoanalytic literary approach, this paper anchors on the assumption that sentimental
love religion brings about lack of emotional control sometimes associated with
violence acts among others murder.
Theoretical Foundation
This paper
is based on the psychoanalytic literary approach. According to Tyson the
psychoanalytical criticism originated from the Freudian Theories of Psychology
as propounded by Sigmund Freud in 1890 in Vienna. For Tyson, psychoanalysis is
centred on three main theories, namely the topographic theory, the structural
psychology, and the Oedipus complex theory.
Firstly,
the topographic psychological theory consists of the concepts of the conscious,
the preconscious, and the unconscious desires. Freud distinguishes the
conscious desires or events that the individual is aware of from the
unconscious or desires and motivations the individual is not aware of, and the
preconscious desires which are in the
process of becoming conscious. Thus Freud assumes that people are driven by
desires and needs or conflicts of which they are unaware (Tyson 14-15). In addition,
Freud maintains that unhappy psychological events in people’s past are
repressed from the conscious and become unconscious. However, these expunged
events are not eliminated, they are rather buried by means of mechanism
defenses to be later displayed in the life of the individual.
Secondly,
Freud associates the topographic psychological structure to the structural
psychology model. He sustains that human desires and unconscious conflicts give
rise to conflict of the three areas of mind, that is the id, the ego, and the
superego. The id refers to the drives or instinctual behaviour patterns and
basic needs. It is the most basic part of the personality, and wants instant
gratification for our wants and needs. If these needs or wants are not met, a
person becomes tense or anxious. On the other hand, the ego shelters the major
defenses against the power of the drives. It deals with reality, trying to meet
the desires of the id in a way that is socially acceptable in the family and
society. This may mean delaying gratification, and helping to get rid of the
tension the id feels if a desire is not met right away. The ego recognizes that
other people have needs and wants too, and that being selfish is not always
good for the individual in the long run. Over the ego is the superego. It is
the area of the unconscious that houses the censure. The superego develops
last, and is based on morals and judgments about right and wrong. Even though
the superego and the ego may reach the same decision about something, the
superego’s reason for that decision is more based on moral values, while the
ego’s decision is based more on what others will think or what the consequences
of an action could be.
Finally,
Freud establishes a relationship between the topographic structural model and
the Oedipus complex. This is in bid to relating superego to symbol of the
father archetype. The superego tends to stand in opposition to the desires of
the id because of their conflicting objectives, and its aggressiveness towards
the ego. The superego acts as the conscious maintaining our sense of morality
and proscription from taboos. The superego and the ego are the product of two
key factors: the state of helplessness of the child and the Oedipus complex.
Its formation takes place during the dissolution of the Oedipus complex and is
formed by an identification with and internalization of the father figure after
little boy cannot successfully hold the mother as a love-object out of fear of
castration. Later, the psychoanalysis of Freud was advanced by Carl Jung by
adding to the Oedipus complex the Electra complex to further the female
psychosexual development. During her psychological development, the girl is
initially attached to her mother. When she discovers that she does not have a
penis, she becomes attached to her father and begins to resent her mother who
she blames for her "castration." As a result, Freud believed that the
girl then begins to identify with and emulate her mother out of fear of losing
her love. According to Freud both the girl and the boys climaxize their Oedipus
or Electra complex with the identification behaviour. The boy identifies
himself to the father in hope of someday possessing a woman like his mother.
For the girl, her sexual desire to the father gives way to a desire to possess
a man like her father later in life.
Freud believes that the psychological topography, the structural
psychology, and the Oedipus complex theory are central to the minds and dreams
of people as adults and affect their writings.
The
psychoanalytic approach fits in the criticism of The Great Gatsby to
understand how the people are fatally driven by
libidinal and instinctual urges. In addition, repressed frustration of
characters kept within the unconscious dictates feelings of fear, denial,
codependency which affect their behaviour patterns and precipitate their tragic
end. Furthermore, there is a form of oedipal complex dictate in divinising love
as sole source of happiness. This kind of sexual behaviour of characters find
reason the authorial subconscious.
Research Methodology
This paper
applies qualitative research based upon the method of collecting, describing,
classifying, and analyzing the data and drawing conclusions. Library
documentation method was used to collect data. Primary data were obtained from
the novel The Great Gatsby by Fitzgerald (2003). Secondary data were
collected from periodicals, textbooks, and internet. According to Cresswell
(2007), the descriptive method as qualitative method fits in describing dreams and
traumatic events. As far as data collection and analytical processes are
concerned, the novel was read repeatedly using the psychoanalytical literary
criticism. In accord to the aims and hypothesis, pertinent notes were taken
from both the primary and secondary sources. They were discussed in the light
of the theoretical framework, were descriptively analysed, and conclusions were
drawn.
Discussion and Findings
Sentimental love religion in The Great Gatsby
generates three deaths, namely the death of Mrs. Myrtle Wilson, the death of
Jay Gatsby, and the death of George Wilson. This fatal love can be analysed
from the perspectives of the unconscious desires, mind structure, defense
mechanism, and psychic determinism of these characters.
1. Adoration of Tom Buchanan and Myrtle’s Death
The novel
depicts Myrtle as an earthy, vital, and voluptuous woman, married to George
Wilson who is desperate to improve her life. She lives her dreams through
unconscious desires which make her living a sexual codependency outside
conjugal bond and succumbs to it. Wilson Myrtle is driven by sexual instincts
rather than sensibility. The author conveys this through the depiction of her
clothing style, her language, her relationship with her husband George Wilson
and her lover Tom Buchanan, a brutal, hulking man and a former Yale football
player who is married Daisy. First, the name Myrtle is used symbolically to
suggest “a fleshy yet beautiful climbing plant vigorously moving upwards”. In
addition, Myrtle dresses “stretched tight over her broad hips”. “Her manner is
rather sharp and affectations are almost comic.
The language she uses is energetic, direct and unselfconscious about her
own sexual needs”. (Štrba 43) All this ensures overt sexuality. She desires to
impresses people among others Tom Buchanan. Although Tom Buchanan sometimes
abuses her, Myrtle collapses before his sexy character.
Daisy! Daisy! Daisy! shouted
Mrs. Wilson. I’ll say it whenever I want to! Daisy! Dai——‘Making a short deft
movement Tom Buchanan broke her nose with his open hand. Then there were bloody
towels upon the bathroom floor, and women’s voices scolding, and high over the
confusion a long broken wail of pain. (Fitzgerald 41)
In running after Tom and denying her husband, Myrtle is
living her id. Though she knows that Tom is married, she endangers her Christian
marriage for the sake of adultery. Her divinisation of Tom is linked with her
material-based love. This is demonstrated through her insult to her husband, “Beat
me!” he heard her cry. “Throw me down and beat me, you dirty little coward!” (Fitzgerald109).
She despises her husband whose low incomes as a garagist does not allow her to
live as the Buchanans and other nobility of the Est Egg. This unconscious
conflict develops into a kind of codependency in form of romance relationship
addiction. She relies on her sex to gain approval of Tom. The author crowns her
addiction in stressing her deep concern with the male through her love of male
pet. In Freud’s terms, this is psychological mechanism is referred to as
projection. Through this excessive attachment to the male sex, Myrtle lives the
extreme point of the Oedipus complex. However, this hysterical behaviour
eventually makes her pay heavy price for her sexual drives. Her denying of
Wilson for Tom is very determinant to her death since she ends up by being run
over by the car driven by Daisy. Actually she is shunning Wilson and envisages
to embrace Tom`s car to be disappointed that the people on board are her
enemies and crush her. Her attitude is foreshadowed by the author through the
depiction of woman by Daisy. Talking about females in general and her daughter
in particular, Daisy mentions, ‘‘I hope she’ll be a fool. That’s the best thing
a girl can be in this world, a beautiful little fool.’’ (Fitzgerald 21) This is
what makes this novel sentimental in the line of American novel wherein the
archetype of the Great Mother rises to beak from the old patriarchy. Women
characters are “pleasure-seeking” rather than home making.
2. Devotion to Myrtle and the Death of Wilson
Myrtle’s
infatuation toward Tom Buchanan is the cause of her husband George Wilson, an
impoverished man whose only passion is his love for his wife. Actually,
Myrtle’s love affairs with Tom creates unconscious conflict in Wilson. He lives
a kind of psychological defeatism and depression and finally commits suicide.
The author depicts him as "a blond, spiritless man, anemic, and faintly
handsome" (Gatsby, 31). This unsexy physical morphology is what repels his
wife from him. As for his material life condition the author portrays that he
is “one of those worn-out men” (Gatsby, 32).
Both his physical and material conditions create a kind of rejection by
his wife. Wilson therefore develops in his unconscious anxious behaviour.
First, he becomes aggressive to his wife with hope to change her lustful
behaviour. But this does not work. The id reaction of Myrtle is captured by the
author. "walking through her husband
as if he were a ghost" (Gatsby, 31); she confirms to have "made a mistake [...] when [she] married him"
(Gatsby, 41). Wilson’s ego compels him to beat his wife to redress her, but the
feedback is his denigration. He resorts to other aggressive ways to chastise
her, as he declares, "I′ve got my wife locked in up [in the flat]. She′s
going to stay there till the day after to-morrow, and then we′re going to move
away" (Gatsby, 143). But Myrtle considers him coward and impotent to
optimally handle her. Wilson goes further in his superego by invoking God to
the sake of Myrtle’s soul to no avail. It only ferments her delirium. It just
crows her impression of a prison-like relationship which she tries to break.
Escaping Wilson to find her idol lover, she is deadly crushed by Daisy. The
author uses this coincidence technique in the storyline to emphasize the determinism
in the death of Wilson and to climaxize the storyline with depression of
Wilson. This death is the unconscious motivation which suscitates an id-based
reaction of Wilson. Totally in depression, he relies on his adversary’s account
of the accident and does not give time to investigation to reveal the real
circumstance of the accident. Without sublimation, he plots to revenge and to
commit suicide. The author plays on this dramatic irony technique, that is
enables the reader to know the truth behind the death of Myrtle that is ignored
by Wilson to reinforce the sentimental love religion issue. This corroborates
to Fiedler`s assertion that sentimental love in The Great Gatsby brings
about tragedy (Fiedler 302).
3. Idolization of Daisy and the Death of Gatsby
Jay Gatsby,
a young man, around thirty years old, who rose from an impoverished childhood
to become wealthy, wants to win back his love with Daisy, a woman he fell in
love long before he became wealthy. The author portrays this protagonist’s
dreams and unconscious motivation, his failure to canalize the tripartite
division of his psyche, that is, his id, ego, and superego, as a determinant
factor of his death. After five years of separation, Gatsby, under the guidance
of Nick (Daisy’s cousin and friend to Gatsby) wants to revivify his love with
Daisy. He becomes infatuated and cannot control himself. Though Daisy is
married and has a child, Gatsby’s repressed love dreams becomes uncontrollable
and explode. He buys a mansion in the west Egg face to the Est Egg where Daisy
and her husband Tom Buchanan stay with hope to revive his love with Daisy.
According to Li and Zheng, Gatsby “held the confidence that Daisy only loved
him and that Daisy’s marriage was just a mistake” (Li and Zheng 53). Thus to
seduce Daisy, Gatsby prepares open luxurious parties with the aim to meet
Daisy. This unconscious desires develops into codependence as Gatsby becomes
caretaker and narcissist. He attracts many people by his parties, nights clubs,
donations at his place in the West Egg. In these open parties, his guests lose
conscience before his Rolls-Royce, marvellous swimming pool, beach, crates of
fresh oranges and lemons, buffet tents in the gardens overflowing with a feast,
and a live orchestra playing under the stars. Liquor is free, and therefore the
entertained huge crowd make the mansion a night club of promiscuity. Gatsby
does not count his expenses. He rather feels grand to pursue his target though
luxurious parties. About his lust for Daisy, the author mentions,
“As I watched him he adjusted
himself a little, visibly. His hand took hold of hers, and as she said
something low in his ear he turned toward her with a rush of emotion. I think
that voice held him most, with its fluctuating, feverish warmth, because it couldn’t
be over-dreamed — that voice was a deathless song.” (Fitzgerald 95)
Daisy’s love manoeuvres sets ablaze Gatsby’s id and plunges
him into his youthful dreams. He becomes passionate and unquestionably
surrenders to Daisy who is attached to the wealthy Tom by marriage. Despite
Tom`s denigration of Gatsby on the basis race and social class, Gatsby remains
determined to gain Daisy. Tom says,
“Self-control [...] I suppose
the latest thing is to sit back and let Mr. Nobody from Nowhere make love to
your wife [...] Nowadays people begin by sneering at family life and family
institutions, and next they’ll throw everything overboard and have
intermarriage between black and white” (Fitzgerald 29).
However, Gatsby proceeds his fantastic tactics. He remains
lecherous and clings to the wanton Daisy”. He does no notice that Daisy is
fickle in love. She is simply a hypocrite seducer. She anticipates Gatsby `s
death by running over Myrtle with a car. Gatsby’s ego and superego remain
dormant under his sexual drives. To emphasize Gatsby’s unconscious and
preconscious behaviour the author uses the Messiah archetype. In fact, Gatsby
remains silent and does not reveals the guilt of Daisy in the accident. This
atoning sacrifice, does not reconcile the two lovers, since soon after Gatsby’s
death, Daisy disappears with Tom. The author here breaks with the renaissance
tradition where writers like Shakespeare uses catharsis scenes to reconcile
lovers and storyline conflicts. The hero here dies while his seducer survives
to mock the stupidity of the seduced heart.
Conclusion
Sentimental
love religion arbitrates fatal end of the characters Jay Gatsby, Myrtle and
George Wilson. In fact, their sexual drives maintain them in id-dictated life.
They react to situations upon love dependence and depression. Gatsby and Myrtle
worship their lovers to fulfill their repressed piled up in their unconscious.
Due to lust for their love idols, Myrtle lives adultery and Gatsby manoeuvres
to take another man’s wife. On the other hand, George Wilson suffers his
adoration of his adulterous wife Myrtle. He is conscious of her love affairs
with Tom, but clings to her as her goddess. He is dejected and the news about
the death of his wife augments his frustration. His aggressive id propels him
to kill Gatsby and himself. This blind attachment to his wife makes the
storyline falling events more tragic with three deaths. Wilson and Gatsby are
dreamers and both die because of their unrequited love for women who love Tom.
The authorial message is linked with Fitzgerald` s life and love struggle in
the twentieth century America which is characterized by revolution of women
against social patriarchal conventions (as reflected in female characters,
mainly Daisy, Myrtle, Catherine, and Jordan), fading Christianity, and race
prejudices.
References
Creswell, John W. Research Design:
Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 4th ed. California: SAGE Publications, Inc.,
2014
Crocker, John
and Celena Kusch. “Race and Class Identity in The Great Gatsby and Passing” in SC Upstate Undergraduate Research Journal, Volume 2,
Fall 2009
Fiedler, A.
Leslie. Love and Death in the American Novel. New York: Criterion Books,
1960 Fitzgerald, F. Scott. The Great Gatsby. New York: Scribner, 2003
Froehlich,
Maggie Gordon. “Jordan Baker, Gender Dissent, and Homosexual Passing in The
Great Gatsby”, The Space
Between, Volume VI:1 2010 ISSN 1551-9309, Penn State Hazleton
Gholipour, Mojtaba and Mina
Sanahmadi. “A Psychoanalytic Attitude to The
Great Gatsby” in International
Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences (IJHMS) Volume 1, Issue 1 (2013) ISSN 2320–4044 (Online)
Li, Q.,
& Zheng, L. L. (2015). “The Greatness of Gatsby in The Great Gatsby”. Advances in Literary Study, 3, 52-57.
Tangshan: Scientific Research Publishing Inc., 2015
Lučić, Ivana Nakić. “The American Dream in The Great
Gatsby by F. S. Fitzgerald”. International Journal of Languages and Literatures, 2(1), pp. 67-76
Reed, Jeremy.
“The American Dream and the Margins in Twentieth Century Fiction in The
Great Gatsby”. Doctor of
Philosophy Dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia, 2009
Samuels, C.
Tomas. The Greatness of "Gatsby" The
Massachusetts Review Vol. 7, No. 4 (Autumn, 1966), pp. 783-794. Massachusetts: The Massachusetts
Review, Inc.
Štrba, Ivan.
“Emancipated Women of The Great Gatsby” in Institute of British and
American Studies, Faculty of
Arts, Prešov University, Prešov, Slovakia
Tyson,
Lois. Critical Theory Today: A User’s Friendly Guide. New York:
Routledge, 2006.
No comments:
Post a Comment